Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Curtains or a fresh lease?

The long-term fate of the Congress in Odisha will crucially hinge on whether it can cash in on the anti-incumbency factor in the 2014 Assembly polls, writes Dhrutikam Mohanty

For Odisha Congress, there is hope in the air. But so is trepidation. Leaders of the state party may not admit as much, but they are acutely aware that the 2014 Assembly polls will be their last chance to bounce back after being out of power for a decade and a half. On the face of it, the current political scenario in Odisha seems to be in favour of Congress, which has been out of power since 1999. With the anti-incumbency factor kicking in, this is the party’s best chance to topple the Naveen Patnaik government.

Congress, which held uninterrupted sway over Odisha for 35 years after Independence, is now facing an acid test. If it can’t get its act together this time around, it could well mean the beginning of another long spell in the wilderness.

 The ruling Biju Janata Dal (BJD) could face dissidence over distribution of party tickets. Its former strategist, Pyari Mohan Mohapatra, has floated a new political party, Odisha Jana Morcha (OJM), and has announced his intention to upset Naveen Patnaik’s applecart. Many BJD poll ticket aspirants could gravitate towards OJM if they are not nominated by the ruling party.

Having been BJD’s election manager in the last two elections, Pyari Mohan knows the party’s chinks. He will definitely play a role in diverting the BJD vote towards non-BJD candidates. This is bound to work to the advantage of the Congress.

The launch of Pyari Mohan’s new political party last week has stirred the pre-poll pot. He announced he would go in for an alliance with any non-BJD party to oust the “blind and autocratic government of Naveen Patnaik”. He claimed that national-level leaders of many political parties are in touch with him for pre-poll tie-ups. He said his alliance will win 80 to 85 seats (in the 147-member Assembly).

Asked about the possibility of OJM joining hands with Congress in Odisha, state Congress president Niranjan Patnaik says, “We are a national party, so any-poll alliance has to be decided at the central level. But Mohapatra has declared that OJM will contest 110 seats. This leaves only 37 seats for the Congress at best. How can we accept this?”

The results of the recent civic body elections in the state have been a shot in the arm for Congress. Candidates of OJM and Congress won most of the seats in the  polls in Hindol, Atabira and Nuapada.While in the newly-formed Hindol Notified Area Council (NAC), Congress won seven and OJM-supported independents won six seats, the ruling BJD managed to get only two seats out of a total of 16.


Similarly, Congress won seven seats in Nuapada NAC against BJD’s four. In the newly formed Atabira NAC, Congress and BJD won six seats each. Political analysts say this is the first poll setback for BJD after Pyari Mohan’s suspension.

But is Congress ready to make the most of the opportunity? “I don’t think so,” says senior political analyst Prashant Patnaik. “Organisationally, Congress is weak. The party faces acute infighting and the senior leadership is bitterly divided.”


Dissidence has indeed been the bane of Odisha Congress for the past decade and a half – a fact that has harmed the party’s stocks in the eyes of the public.

The last spell of Congress rule in Odisha was under Janaki Ballava Patnaik in 1995. It was chaotic and scandal-ridden. Corruption charges, scandals and weak leadership made the party unpopular. The party’s decline in Odisha began when it failed in relief and rehabilitation work in the aftermath of the 1990 super cyclone.

In the 2000 Assembly elections, Congress was down to only 26 seats from 80. In 2004, the party did marginally better, winning 38 seats. In the current Assembly, however, the party has 27 seats. Similarly, while Congress won nearly 35 per cent of the vote in 2004, its vote share declined to 29 percent in 2009.

Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi visited the state in February. During his two-day stay, he interacted with party functionaries at the district, block and panchayat levels and held marathon sessions. He wanted to figure out why Congress had become so weak in Odisha.

After Rahul’s visit, the state Congress leadership declared that grassroots workers would have a say in the selection of the party’s poll candidates, preference would be given to youth, and no family would be allowed to field more than one aspirant.

Sivananda Ray, state Congress vice-president claims, “People are no longer obsessed with the so-called clean image of Naveen. They are fed up with rampant corruption and irresponsible administration. I strongly believe Congress will return to power.”

If it does not, the party would be in danger of going into terminal decline in Odisha the way it has done in Tamil Nadu, Gujarat and Chhattisgarh.

The Congress last ruled Tamil Nadu in 1967. Since then, it has only been riding piggyback on either of the two main Dravidian parties, DMK and AIADMK. The recent UNHRC resolution on Sri Lanka was a good opportunity for the party to attempt a political comeback. But that opportunity was lost. Right now, the national party is seen as a liability in TN and no outfit would want to align with it to fight the 2014 Lok Sabha polls.

Similarly, Congress has been out of power for over 20 years in Gujarat, with Narendra Modi performing an electoral hattrick. Problems abound for the party in the state, once its stronghold.

The situation is no different in Chhattisgarh, where a factionalism-ridden Congress is struggling to make a comeback. The Raman Singh-led BJP is eying a hattrick in the state. Last year, soon after the Congress defeat in the Bastar Lok Sabha byelection, a young Congressman had accused the party of being “BJP's B team”.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman

ExecutiveMBA

Monday, June 3, 2013

No glasshouses here

While the BJP takes the rap for communalism, Congress excesses have been conveniently overlooked, writes Chandran Iyer

Think communalism, talk Narendra Modi. For the 'secular' media, while the Gujarat Chief Minister is the ultimate embodiment of all that is evil, thanks to the 2002 anti-Muslim riots in the state, the role of Congress governments where riots are a frequent happening, have surprisingly gone unnoticed. A shining example of this paradox: a three-month-long communal outbreak currently in the works in Assam, has gone virtually unnoticed after the initial light and sound.

Go back a little further and see Maharashtra, the state of riots, terror attacks and jehadi indoctrination and you will notice a distinct Congress flavour – all quite subtle of course.

The communal question, never too far below the surface in Maharashtra, revisited Dhule on January 6 this year. The ostensible reason for the rioting was an unpaid restaurant bill but as later inquires have revealed, the flimsy issue was stoked by policemen who also indulged in rampant vandalism which has been well captured on video clips.

Six police personnel were held in incidents of looting and violence: The toll: 6 dead, 42 injured, and legs of two had to be amputated bringing back memories of 2008 riots in which 11 people were shot dead.

But what catapulted Maharashtra into global limelight were the Mumbai riots which began in the immediate aftermath of the Babri Masjid demolition on December 2, 1992. The Sri Krishna Commission report, which probed the incidents, said the first was mainly a minority backlash as a result of the demolition in the week which followed. The second phase was a Hindu backlash, which came after the killings of Hindu Mathadi Kamgar worker by minority fanatics in south Bombay’s Dongri area, stabbing of Hindus in Muslim-majority colonies and the burning of six Hindus, including a physically handicapped girl in Radhabai Chawl.

How much has the communal scenario changed in Maharashtra after 1992-93? Justice B. N. Srikrishna who headed the famous Srikrishna Commission of Inquiry constituted by the Government of Maharashtra, told TSI that things have changed but not much. "While I would not say that the issue of communal divide in Maharashtra has completely died down, I would say it has improved greatly as compared to 1992-1993. It is like a scar tissue over wound – does not bother you normally, but scratch it deep and it may bleed,’’ he adds for good measure.

According to Justice Srikrishna, there should be a concerted effort to remove this communal divide. “What is needed is building bridges across the hearts of people. Stressing that we are Indians first and all else later, better understanding of each other and the resolve to solve dissensions and disputes without resort to violence,’’ sums up  Justice Srikrishna.

He should know. For five years until 1998, the justice examined victims, witnesses and alleged perpetrators of the riots. The Commission was disbanded by the Shiv Sena-led government in January 1996 and on public opposition, reconstituted on May 28, 1996 with a major change in its terms of reference: it would also probe the Mumbai bomb blasts that followed in March 1993.

How serious is the Maharashtra government in bridging this communal gap? Noted journalist Meena Menon, author of a book “Riots and After in Mumbai: Chronicles of Truth and Reconciliation”, who painstakingly captured the horrors of those days, says, "I would prefer to look at this question in terms which are less black and white. Because intrinsically communities have lived together and continue to live together in a city like Mumbai. What one has to examine is why are there an increasing number of ghettos dominated by a single community and why there is so much insecurity that communities, both Hindus or Muslims, are flocking to live with their own members. To a large extent, it is driven by fear, violence and past experiences. Before the Bhiwandi riots, which also took its toll on Mumbai in 1984, and again the post-Babri Masjid violence, both communities enjoyed a certain degree of trust but that was shattered after these two major happenings.''

According to her, "the role of political parties in furthering this sense of insecurity and fear using violence cannot be underestimated. That's the major issue which is not being addressed. The role of Right Wing parties, actions of extreme elements in both communities and the lack of accountability for their deeds or words. Hate speech is a crime that often goes unpunished but plays a majorly  divisive role.’’

But the good thing is that there is consensus on not politicising religion. Says Sayyed Bhai, founder of the Muslim Satyashodhak Mandal in Pune, a reformist organisation dedicated to communal harmony, "politicisation of religion is the biggest cause of communal divide. This is fountainhead of all communal problems”. Sayyed, who  has been working for women’s rights and reform in Muslim society, is a much-decorated man. As initiator of the Muslim reformist movement after his sister was summarily divorced by her husband 50 years ago, he was an active campaigner for equal women rights during the Shah Banu case back in the 1980s. He went headlong to support Shah Banu, the Muslim woman and mother of five from Indore, Madhya Pradesh, who was divorced by her husband in 1978 and was subsequently denied alimony.

This case caused the Rajiv Gandhi government, with its absolute majority, to pass the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 which diluted the secular judgment of the Supreme Court and, in reality, denied even utterly destitute Muslim divorcées the right to alimony from their former husbands. "I bluntly told Rajiv Gandhi that he was doing great injustice to Muslim women," he recalls.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman

ExecutiveMBA

Saturday, June 1, 2013

Film for film's sake!

His purpose has always been to entertain the audience. And after three such entertaining films – Heyy Babyy, Housefull and Housefull 2 – Sajid Khan promises to light up the day and mood of his audience with his promising upcoming flick, Himmatwala. With Pratishtha Malhotra,Sajid Khan shares his thoughts on filmmaking and challenges as a filmmaker.

You had tried your hands at hosting shows and you also worked as a fashion choreographer before you took to direction. Was it a conscious decision to explore these avenues or did you just go with the flow?
I had started working since the age of 14 and I just did whatever came to me most naturally. I think every aspect of entertainment like holding a crowd and entertaining them came very naturally to me. I was not picking work, work was picking me. It was not that I was doing it to have fun; I was working to earn a living. However, I always wanted to make films. I was doing well in television and once you start doing well there, you don’t want to move ahead and do something else. But by the time I was 34-35, I decided that I would give up television and concentrate on doing films.

From Heyy Babyy to Housefull 2, your movies have grown in terms box office collections. What according to you is the reason for your success?
I  don’t consider myself a great director, but I do consider myself a very great member of the audience. I don’t make films to satisfy my creative urges. I make films to satisfy the audience. My films will always be very successful because their purpose is to entertainment the audience. I would never ever make films for critical acclaim or for self-praise, but I will always make films to make sure that my audience has a great time. When they leave the theatre they should feel that their money was well spent.

A filmmaker recently made a statement that one can’t take reviews to the bank. You seem to agree with this…

I don’t agree with two things. One, in reviews and secondly, I don’t believe in making films for the bank. I have never ever been worried about my films not doing well or how much money it’ll make because I know for a fact that if my films will entertain, they will do well. I feel that any film that does well is an entertaining film irrespective of its budget. Any film that flops is simply not entertaining. It’s that simple. I don’t care about reviews no matter how good they are or how bad they are. They don’t make any difference.

The response to the rushes of Himmatwala has been good. But even before the shooting had started, you had claimed that theatres will be full for the first three days and no tickets will be available…
There are two reasons for this. One is that it’s my fourth film and I know for a fact that there is a very very loyal audience waiting to see my film because they know that it will be entertaining. And I will never ever disappoint my audience. The day I disappoint my audience will be the day I will not make films again. The second reason is my teaming up with Ajay Devgn. Lots of people are very curious to see what Ajay Devgn and Sajid Khan’s team is going to do. For that, again, I want to tell them that they’ll be incredibly happy and not at all disappointed. So that’s why I said it that it will be very difficult to obtain tickets in the first three days in current booking.

You’re known to send written notes to your cast that the film they’re shooting for would be the biggest of their career. How are you sure of this even before the first shot?
It’s wishful thinking. I give them a welcome note on the first day of the shoot, which is sort of a thank you letter for having faith in me and doing the film, and promising that if they listen to me and do exactly what I ask for, we will make a film for the audience. And if we keep our audience happy, we will together make the biggest hit. This way, the work starts on a very positive note. I’ve always done that and what’s wrong with it? I have made three films and all three of them have been blockbusters.

You and Akshay Kumar have been a great team in the past. Didn’t you consider him for Himmatwala?
Well, I always wanted to make Himmatwala with Ajay Devgn. Actually, Ajay and I have been friends since college. It’s just that we never got a chance to work with each other. This is the first time that we are working together and I’m sure you will see more films of mine with Ajay.

How did you decide to cast Tamanna?
I wanted a south Indian heroine, someone very big in the south. That’s because the 1983 version of the film had Sridevi who’s from the south. So I cast Tamanna.

You had once said that your films will never have violence and bloodshed, and Himmatwala is an action movie. How did you managing action without bloodshed?
Well, it’s not a full-on action movie. There is a lot of action in the film, but there is no violence. There is a huge difference between action and violence. Jackie Chan films have action and Quentin Tarantino movies have violence. I don’t believe in certain things like violence, cleavage show, sex and double meaning dialogues. I don’t endorse it, I wouldn’t see it and I wouldn’t want to put any of it in my films… something which you cannot watch with little kids, ladies and family. My films have to be clean and wholesome that families can enjoy. Himmatwala also has a lot of comedy and a lot of drama. It’s a complete entertainer.

What has been the biggest challenge for you as a director?
The biggest challenge for me has always been the script. It has to be such that I don’t disappoint my audience. While writing a screenplay I always make sure I write a scene for people to enjoy where they don’t think about me as a director, but more about the scene. That always is a challenge.

Do you think a film’s promotions play a big role in the success or failure of a film?
No, I don’t agree. No amount of promotions can save a bad film and a good film doesn’t need promotions. Promotions are important because, today, the media is very active. Promotions are important, but they are not the only factor for a film working or not working. I can name 25 films in the last five years which have been promoted very heavily and have been disasters at the box office.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
IIPM’s Management Consulting Arm-Planman Consulting
Professor Arindam Chaudhuri – A Man For The Society….
IIPM: Indian Institute of Planning and Management
IIPM makes business education truly global
Management Guru Arindam Chaudhuri
Rajita Chaudhuri-The New Age Woman

ExecutiveMBA